| IN BRIEF
|
THE December 2, a Cambodian court has delivered an eye-opening verdict on the dangers surrounding surrogacy (GPA). Thirteen Filipino women were sentenced to four years in prison for their involvement in an illegal surrogacy scheme. This case highlights the severe repression of this practice in Cambodia, where the law considers surrogacy a crime. In a context where poor women become targets in the maternity trade, ethical and legal issues arise acutely.
In Cambodia, thirteen Filipino women have been sentenced to four years in prison for their role in a surrogacy scheme (GPA). The court ruling, handed down by the Kandal Provincial Court, highlights growing concerns over surrogacy legislation and the treatment of women involved in the controversial trade. While surrogacy is considered a crime in the country, this case raises ethical questions about justice and the protection of human rights in the context of commercial motherhood.
The accusations and the judgment
The thirteen Filipino women, arrested in early October in the commune of Prek Anchanh, were accused of attempted sale, purchase Or exchange of human beings. Under Article 16 of the Law on the Suppression of Human Trafficking, their involvement in surrogacy was classified as trafficking in persons for cross-border transfer. Two women received suspended sentences, while a Cambodian housekeeper was also sentenced for failing to report these “crimes”.
Cambodian legislation on surrogacy
Surrogacy is considered a crime in Cambodia. According to a court spokesperson, this practice “undermines security and public order” and “seriously affects the rights of babies and children”. Indeed, national and international laws protect the right of children to be cared for and raised by their biological mothers. This judicial decision thus underlines the urgent need for robust regulations and reinforced protection for families involved in surrogacy situations.
The responsibility of surrogate mothers
As part of the judgment, the court spokesperson recalled that “according to the law, a woman who gives birth is the mother of the child.” This raises a fundamental question in the debate on surrogacy: who is really the mother? In this case, the evidence presented indicates that the thirteen women were trying to give birth to children to sell them to third parties abroad. Thus, the court considered this practice to be human trafficking, which highlights the idea that surrogate mothers who seek financial compensation for their pregnancy can be perceived as criminals.
A global phenomenon and its consequences
This case is not isolated, as similar cases of surrogacy have been reported in Cambodia, involving foreign women. This global trend for surrogacy raises concerns about the exploitation of women, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds, who see the practice as a way to support themselves. Reports like that ofCIAMS illustrate how migrant women can be recruited as surrogate mothers, often without being fully aware of the legal and ethical implications of their actions.
What paths to a better future?
Judicial decisions like this raise crucial issues, not only for convicted surrogate mothers but also for the entire surrogacy system. The need for clear regulations and ethical guidelines on surrogacy practices is more present than ever. Different countries have already put in place legislation to regulate this practice, but the evolving path towards ethical and responsible surrogacy remains strewn with pitfalls.
At the same time, it is essential to open the dialogue on the protection of the rights of babies and mothers within the framework of surrogacy. Raising awareness among populations and political leaders about the social and ethical issues linked to surrogacy is crucial to prevent other cases of repressive justice in the future.